Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance

EIN: 463726555 501(c)(3) Environment

Mammoth, AZ

Total Revenue
$10,128
Total Expenses
$31,410
Total Assets
$7,868
Net Assets
$7,868
🔒

Financial Vulnerability Assessment (Tuckman-Chang)

4 risk indicators measuring financial stability and operational resilience

Sign in with your work email to view Tuckman-Chang indicators

Sign In — Free (10 views/day)

Financial Trends

Organization Details

Formation Year
2013
Legal Domicile
AZ
Tax Period
2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31

Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance, founded in 2013, is a micro nonprofit in the Environment sector that reported $10K in total revenue in fiscal year 2022. Revenue fell 82% from the prior year — a significant decline worth monitoring. Expenses of $31K exceeded revenue, resulting in a 210% operating deficit.

Mission

The mission of the Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance is to unite conservation-minded individuals, groups and agencies to protect the threatened lower San Pedro River ecosystem and its supporting watershed.

Program Service Accomplishments

Program 1
Expenses: $14,470

Conservation easement monitoring, managing, and reporting: Investment earnings generated by an endowment from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (the conservation easement holder) to conduct this...

Read more

Conservation easement monitoring, managing, and reporting: Investment earnings generated by an endowment from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (the conservation easement holder) to conduct this contracted work. Our financial committee, consisting of two LSPWA directors, voluntarily continued to monitor and report on the status of the endowment account during 2022. The 3-Links field monitoring committee, consisting of four volunteer LSPWA directors, continued to review, edit, and approve all quarterly and annual reports prepared by our contracted field manager until that contract was terminated at the end of the fiscal year. Additionally, the field committee developed an extensive supplemental violation report in 2022 that was submitted to the easement holder. In total, our volunteer committee members invested approximately 800 volunteer hours to the past years activities in this program area.

Program 2
Expenses: $10,000

Legal/administrative process efforts: associated with advocacy for following conservation laws. LSPWA invested approximately 1400 hours of volunteer time responding to permit applications at the...

Read more

Legal/administrative process efforts: associated with advocacy for following conservation laws. LSPWA invested approximately 1400 hours of volunteer time responding to permit applications at the federal and state levels by a private corporation that desires to establish a new infrastructure corridor through 33 miles of previously undisturbed landscape in the most ecologically sensitive portion of the lower San Pedro Valley. We also wrapped up our involvement in another case, with the federal government admitting that they improperly issued a Clean Water Act permit to a private corporation desiring to build a 70,000-resident development on the River. The U.S. Department of Justice has agreed to reimburse legal expenses to LSPWA, five co-plaintiffs, and attorneys at Earthjustice. Three members of LSPWA (two directors and one member at large) served on the litigation review committee, and other LSPWA members contributed volunteer hours.

Program 3
Expenses: $2,450

Collaborative Conservation: LSPWA spent about 350 hours of LSPWA volunteer time to participate in quarterly meetings, working group meetings, field events, fence removal work, wildlife monitoring...

Read more

Collaborative Conservation: LSPWA spent about 350 hours of LSPWA volunteer time to participate in quarterly meetings, working group meetings, field events, fence removal work, wildlife monitoring, invasive species control, and document preparation. This program area benefits our mission by developing collaborative relationships with other parties interested in conserving the natural resources of the lower San Pedro watershed, as we accomplish conservation goals related to public education, sustainable rural economic development, appropriate recreation, wildlife corridor connectivity, the coordination of various County resource plans, soil and water conservation, and the abatement of invasive vegetation species.

🔒

Trantor Score

Financial Health Score (300–850) · Liquidity · Solvency · Sustainability · Efficiency

Sign in to view Trantor Score and financial metrics

Liquidity (40%) • Solvency (30%) • Sustainability (20%) • Efficiency (10%)

Sign In — Free (10 views/day)

Financial Overview (2022)

Revenue Breakdown

Contributions & Grants $1,200
Program Service Revenue $0
Investment Income $8,928
Other Revenue $0
TOTAL REVENUE $10,128

Expense Breakdown

Grants Paid $0
Salaries & Benefits $0
Fundraising Expenses $0
Program Expenses $26,920
Other Expenses $31,410
TOTAL EXPENSES $31,410

Year-over-Year Comparison

2022 2021 Change
Revenue $10,128 $55,684 -0.8%
Expenses $31,410 $12,223 +1.6%
Net Income $-21,282 $43,461 -1.5%
Key Indicators
Grants to Organizations Grants to Individuals Lobbying Political Activity Foreign Activities Donor Advised Fund Schedule B Required
🔒

Financial Health Indicators

Comprehensive financial analysis: Altman Z-Score, liquidity, solvency, sustainability, efficiency, and growth metrics

Financial Distress Indicator

Liquidity & Cash Position

Sign in to view all financial metrics

Altman Z-Score • Liquidity Ratios • Solvency Analysis • Growth Indicators • Efficiency Metrics

Sign In

Governance

Voting Members
9
Independent Members
9
Employees
N/A
Volunteers
24

Governance Policies

Conflict of Interest Policy
Whistleblower Policy
Document Retention Policy

Special Practices & Reported Activities

Operated a School
Operated a Hospital
Provided First Class Travel
Reported Conflict of Interest
Reported Asset Diversion
Excess Benefit Transaction
Made Political Expenditures
Engaged in Lobbying
Operated Donor Advised Fund
Maintained Art Collections
Filed Form 720

Compensation of Officers, Directors & Key Employees

Total Officers
4
$0
Total Directors
13
$0
Key Employees
0
$0
Highest Compensated
0
reported
Name Title Hours/Week Role Reportable Comp Other Comp Total
Anna Lands Director 2.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Robert Evans Director 1.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Matt Clark Director 1.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Scott Wilbor Director 2.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Elna Otter Director 1.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Diane Laush Director 6.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
H Leslie Hall Director 2.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Lon Brehmer Director 2.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Barbara Clark Director 4.00
Director
$0 $0 $0
Peter Else Chair 32.00
Officer Director
$0 $0 $0
Suzanne Kelly Secretary 2.00
Officer Director
$0 $0 $0
David Omick Vice-Chair 4.00
Officer Director
$0 $0 $0
Catherine Gorman Treasurer 7.00
Officer Director
$0 $0 $0
Note: Compensation data is self-reported by the organization on their Form 990. "Reportable Comp" includes salary, bonuses, and other reportable compensation from the organization and related organizations. "Other Comp" includes benefits, deferred compensation, and non-taxable benefits.

Historical Data

Year Revenue Expenses Assets Net Income
2022 $10,128 $31,410 $7,868 $-21,282
2021 $55,684 $12,223 $698,633 $43,461
2020 $34,726 $22,678 $618,973 $12,048
Explore More Nonprofits
Top 100 Nonprofits in Arizona Largest U.S. Nonprofits Best Rated Nonprofits Most Efficient Nonprofits

Compare Lower San Pedro Watershed Alliance with other nonprofits in Arizona and across the country.