JUSTICE IN AGING

🔒

Financial Vulnerability Assessment (Tuckman-Chang)

4 risk indicators measuring financial stability and operational resilience

Sign in with your work email to view Tuckman-Chang indicators

Financial Trends

Organization Details

Formation Year

1977

Legal Domicile

Principal Officer

KEVIN PRINDIVILLE

Phone

2022896976

Tax Period

2022-07-01 to 2023-06-30

JUSTICE IN AGING, founded in 1977, is a community nonprofit that reported $5.0M in total revenue in fiscal year 2022. Revenue fell 45% from the prior year — a significant decline worth monitoring. Expenses of $6.0M exceeded revenue, resulting in a 21% operating deficit.

Mission

THE MISSION OF JUSTICE IN AGING IS TO ADVOCATE NATIONWIDE TO PROMOTE THE INDEPENDENCE AND WELL-BEING OF LOW-INCOME ELDERLY AND DISABLED AMERICANS.

Program Service Accomplishments

Program 1

Expenses: $3,262,013 Revenue: $61,190

HEALTH CARE ADVOCACY - JUSTICE IN AGING ENSURES THAT LOW-INCOME OLDER AMERICANS ARE ABLE TO ACCESS HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE THROUGH MEDICAID, MEDICARE, AND OTHER PROGRAMS...

HEALTH CARE ADVOCACY - JUSTICE IN AGING ENSURES THAT LOW-INCOME OLDER AMERICANS ARE ABLE TO ACCESS HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE THROUGH MEDICAID, MEDICARE, AND OTHER PROGRAMS. THROUGH JUSTICE IN AGING'S EXPERTISE IN LAW, ELDER RIGHTS, AND THE GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THAT DELIVER HEALTH CARE TO LOW-INCOME SENIORS, JUSTICE IN AGING BREAKS DOWN BARRIERS LOW-INCOME SENIORS FACE IN GETTING THE CARE THEY NEED. JUSTICE IN AGING ADVOCATES TO ENSURE THAT HEALTH CARE SERVICES PRIORITIZE HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES OVER INSTITUTIONS, HONOR CHOICE, AND INCLUDE STRONG CONSUMER PROTECTIONS. FURTHER, BY FOCUSING JUSTICE IN AGING'S WORK ON POPULATIONS WHO HAVE BEEN MARGINALIZED AND EXCLUDED FROM JUSTICE. JUSTICE IN AGING ADDRESSES DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE CAUSED BY (CONTINUE ON SCHEDULE O) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2, PART III) ETHNICITY, ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY, DISABILITY, GENDER IDENTITY, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, OR OTHER POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGE. JUSTICE IN AGING ADVANCES THE HEALTH CARE RIGHTS OF OLDER ADULTS THROUGH AN INNOVATIVE COMBINATION OF TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL ADVOCATES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS, ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY, AND ADVICE ON HEALTH CARE ISSUES TO SEVERAL THOUSAND DIRECT SERVICE PROVIDERS.

Program 2

Expenses: $1,484,772 Revenue: $0

ECONOMIC SECURITY ADVOCACY - JUSTICE IN AGING PRESERVES, STRENGTHENS, EXPANDS, AND IMPROVES THE INCOME SUPPORTS THAT HELP LOW-INCOME OLDER AMERICANS AFFORD FOOD, SHELTER, AND OTHER BASIC NECESSITIES. JUSTICE IN AGING USES ITS LEGAL EXPERTISE TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE PROGRAMS SUCH AS SOCIAL SECURITY AND SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME (SSI) SO THEY PROVIDE ADEQUATE FUNDS TO HELP LOW-INCOME SENIORS MEET THEIR BASIC NEEDS; ARE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL SENIORS WHO QUALIFY WITHOUT ARBITRARY DISRUPTIONS, DENIALS, OR DELAYS; AND ARE DELIVERED WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, ETHNICITY, LANGUAGE ABILITY, DISABILITY, GENDER IDENTITY, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, OR OTHER POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGE. JUSTICE IN AGING ADVANCES THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF OLDER ADULTS THROUGH AN INNOVATIVE COMBINATION OF TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL (CONTINUE ON SCHEDULE O) (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2, PART III) ADVOCATES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS, ADMINISTRATIVE ADVOCACY, AND IMPACT LITIGATION. EACH YEAR, JUSTICE IN AGING PROVIDES TRAINING AND ADVICE ON ECONOMIC SECURITY ISSUES TO SEVERAL THOUSAND DIRECT SERVICE PROVIDERS.

Program 3

Expenses: $461,737 Revenue: $0

LITIGATION - AS THE ONLY NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOCUSED SOLELY ON PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF LOW-INCOME SENIORS, JUSTICE IN AGING PARTNERS WITH ADVOCATES ON THE GROUND WHO HELP JUSTICE IN AGING MONITOR AND UNCOVER ISSUES THAT IMPACT POOR SENIORS. WHEN A GROUP NEEDS A CHAMPION IN THE COURTS, JUSTICE IN AGING IS THERE, ON ITS OWN OR IN PARTNERSHIP WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, TO LITIGATE PRECEDENT-SETTING CASES THAT BENEFIT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SENIORS.

🔒

Trantor Score

Financial Health Score (300–850) · Liquidity · Solvency · Sustainability · Efficiency

Sign in to view Trantor Score and financial metrics

Liquidity (40%) • Solvency (30%) • Sustainability (20%) • Efficiency (10%)

Financial Overview (2022)

Revenue Breakdown

Contributions & Grants $4,862,439

Program Service Revenue $52,654

Investment Income $89,022

Other Revenue $8,536

TOTAL REVENUE $5,012,651

Expense Breakdown

Grants Paid $0

Salaries & Benefits $5,017,242

Fundraising Expenses $172,550

Program Expenses $5,208,522

Other Expenses $1,030,696

TOTAL EXPENSES $6,047,938

Year-over-Year Comparison

	2022	2021	Change
Revenue	$5,012,651	$9,051,356	-0.4%
Expenses	$6,047,938	$4,432,906	+0.4%
Net Income	$-1,035,287	$4,618,450	-1.2%

Key Indicators

✗ Grants to Organizations ✗ Grants to Individuals ✓ Lobbying ✗ Political Activity ✗ Foreign Activities ✗ Donor Advised Fund ✓ Schedule B Required

🔒

Financial Health Indicators

Comprehensive financial analysis: Altman Z-Score, liquidity, solvency, sustainability, efficiency, and growth metrics

Financial Distress Indicator

Liquidity & Cash Position

Sign in to view all financial metrics

Altman Z-Score • Liquidity Ratios • Solvency Analysis • Growth Indicators • Efficiency Metrics

Governance

Voting Members

Independent Members

Employees

Volunteers

Governance Policies

✓ Conflict of Interest Policy

✓ Whistleblower Policy

✓ Document Retention Policy

Special Practices & Reported Activities

✗ Operated a School

✗ Operated a Hospital

✗ Provided First Class Travel

✗ Reported Conflict of Interest

✗ Reported Asset Diversion

✗ Excess Benefit Transaction

✗ Made Political Expenditures

✓ Engaged in Lobbying

✗ Operated Donor Advised Fund

✗ Maintained Art Collections

✗ Filed Form 720

Compensation of Officers, Directors & Key Employees

Total Officers

$238,111

Total Directors

Key Employees

Highest Compensated

reported

Name	Title	Hours/Week	Role	Reportable Comp	Other Comp	Total
JEAN ACCIUS	CHAIR	1.00	Officer Director	$0	$0	$0
DIEGO CARTAGENA	VICE CHAIR	1.00	Officer Director	$0	$0	$0
RICHARD ALEXANDER	DIRECTOR	1.00	Officer Director	$0	$0	$0
MARY JANE CICCARELLO	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
YANIRA CRUZ	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
VERNA EGGLESTON	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
DAVID H FRY	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
RUSSELL L HIRSCHHORN	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
SAM HO	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
ROBERT K JOHNSON	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
GREGORY R JONES	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
NINA KOHN	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
HANNAH E M LIEBERMAN	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
BARRY LITT	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
ANN MARIE MARCIARILLE	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
PAUL NATHANSON	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
E PERCIL STANFORD	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
FERNANDO TORRES-GIL	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
KATE VILLERS	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
JOYCE WALKER	DIRECTOR	1.00	Director	$0	$0	$0
KEVIN PRINDIVILLE	EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	35.00	Officer	$201,728	$36,383	$238,111
REGAN BAILEY	LITIGATION DIRECTOR	35.00	Highest	$152,500	$18,315	$170,815
ERIC CARLSON	DIRECTOR, LTSS ADVOCACY	35.00	Highest	$147,000	$22,346	$169,346
JENNIFER GOLDBERG	DEPUTY DIRECTOR	35.00	Highest	$157,000	$22,141	$179,141
TRACY GRONNIGER	MANAGING DIRECTOR, ECONOMIC SECURITY	35.00	Highest	$133,750	$22,242	$155,992
AMBER CHRIST	MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEALTH ADVOCACY	35.00	Highest	$131,221	$27,219	$158,440

Note: Compensation data is self-reported by the organization on their Form 990. "Reportable Comp" includes salary, bonuses, and other reportable compensation from the organization and related organizations. "Other Comp" includes benefits, deferred compensation, and non-taxable benefits.

Historical Data

Year	Revenue	Expenses	Assets	Net Income
2025	No data	No data	No data	No data
2024	No data	No data	No data	No data
2023	$5,012,651	$6,047,938	$8,876,189	$-1,035,287
2022	$9,051,356	$4,432,906	$9,451,604	$4,618,450
2021	$4,349,019	$3,975,553	$4,789,014	$373,466
2020	$5,465,319	$3,876,724	$4,404,025	$1,588,595
2019	$3,224,355	$3,524,235	$2,732,872	$-299,880